Home > Cannot Restore > Cannot Restore Segment Prot After Reloc Fedora

Cannot Restore Segment Prot After Reloc Fedora

Contents

better would be to follow the instructions given in the setroubleshoot report: sudo chcon -t textrel_shlib_t /opt/google/chrome/chrome this still results in (two, different) selinux _warnings_ but allows chrome to function (because Fixed with (as root): chcon -t usr_t /opt/google/chrome/chrome-sandbox Comment 22 by [email protected], Aug 13 2011 Processing Status: ExternalDependency Summary: Will not start on Fedora systems (was: NULL) I filed another bug What architecture of Fedora? Picks up this change: commit 60863978fd734d9b442b5dc782be8bfed5dcc948 Author: [email protected] Date: Thu Sep 29 21:02:31 2011 +0000 Configure 32-bit Linux to be PIC-clean. his comment is here

Comment 61 by [email protected], Sep 25 2011 Processing [email protected] escreveu em 25-09-2011 16:46: N Comment 62 by [email protected], Sep 25 2011 Processing Does anyone know how to interpret the useful-sounding eu-textrel So it's a sensible SELinux policy that disallows this kind of access for most processes. Comment 54 by [email protected], Sep 23 2011 Processing @craig.schlenter: can you paste the same eu-findtextrel command against the Chrome 14 binary? BUG= 87704 http://codereview.chromium.org/8036033/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Project Member Comment 70 by [email protected], Sep 27 2011 Processing The following revision refers to this bug: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=102932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r102932 | [email protected] | Tue Sep 27 07:56:09 More Bonuses

Cannot Restore Segment Prot After Reloc Permission Denied Linux

that's just asking for an intrusion. confidence) suggests ************************** If you believe that squid3 should be allowed execmod access on the squid3 file by default. In this case we'll get a NULL // result. Fixed with: chcon -t usr_t /opt/google/chrome/chrome-sandbox Project Member Comment 68 by [email protected], Sep 27 2011 Processing The following revision refers to this bug: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=102920 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r102920 | [email protected] | Tue Sep

I'm admittedly ignorant about how bad they are, so could you summarize? Then you should report this as a bug. Or is it trying to talk about files that _reference_ functions? Libjvm.so Cannot Restore Segment Prot After Reloc Permission Denied Please turn JavaScript back on and reload this page.

Comment 114 by [email protected], Nov 1 2011 Processing @mcgrathr : oh so they (TEXTRELs) aren't bad? Cannot Restore Segment Prot After Reloc Permission Denied Java You can configure SELinux temporarily to allow /opt/google/chrome/chrome to use relocation as a workaround, until the library is fixed. Comment 110 by [email protected], Oct 29 2011 Processing If TEXTRELs are evil (are they?) why allow them for 16 if they are already fixed there? click to read more Scratching my head till this post showed me what to do -- I'd never thought it might have to do with SELinux, especially as the cryptic error in the Catalina.err file

Comment 19 Deleted Comment 20 by [email protected], Aug 12 2011 Processing Same issue here. Error While Loading Shared Libraries: Cannot Restore Segment Prot After Reloc: Permission Denied no luck. If you are seeing this bug or have new data, please click New Issue to start a new bug. chrome-avc.txt 3.1 KB View Download Comment 26 by [email protected], Aug 18 2011 Processing my $.02: The following statement is a bit whiny: It is frustrating that users come to us when

Cannot Restore Segment Prot After Reloc Permission Denied Java

setenforce 0 makes you vulnerable in a similar way to how --no-sandbox does, only system-wide.. https://kb.froglogic.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=131196 Comment 115 by [email protected], Nov 1 2011 Processing TEXTRELs are indeed undesireable. Cannot Restore Segment Prot After Reloc Permission Denied Linux This has been " "reported to be caused by Nvidia's libGL. Cannot Restore Segment Prot After Reloc Permission Denied Redhat comment 33 on root works...

That's a security _fix_, not a security problem :) If there's some magic compiler flag we can add (on top of -fPIC -pie) to prevent this problem whilst keeping ASLR, I'm this content There shouldn't be any output. Register All Albums FAQ Today's Posts Search Security and Privacy Sadly, malware, spyware, hackers and privacy threats abound in today's world. Re: cannot restore segment prot after reloc: Permission denied 807603 Jun 17, 2005 7:45 PM (in response to 807603) Yes it was a selinux issue. Cannot Restore Segment Prot After Reloc Permission Denied Oracle

they are extremely helpful and knowledgeable. You should expect" " time related functions to misbehave. " "http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16800"; } if (!g_libc_localtime) g_libc_localtime = gmtime; if (!g_libc_localtime_r) g_libc_localtime_r = gmtime_r; } struct tm* localtime(const time_t* timep) { if (g_am_zygote_or_renderer) http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=lib%2Fi386%2Flibawt.so+fc3 Like Show 0 Likes(0) Actions 2. weblink Comment 84 by [email protected], Oct 3 2011 Processing Labels: -Mstone-15 Mstone-16 punting to 16.

It should load up normally. Selinux Cannot Restore Segment Prot After Reloc: Permission Denied Otherwise, I think the bug that has filed against Fedora to consider updating their policy, seems like best way forward? Comment 118 by [email protected], Jan 5 2012 Processing Use http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=109318 for the 17 regression.

Comment 97 by [email protected]omium.org, Oct 10 2011 Processing I am unable to launch chrome , I installed the latest rpm build 16.0.901.0 (Official Build 104057) dev on my Fedora 32 bit

The best SELinux article that I used to understand SELinux was found at: http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/rhel6/rhel_6_selinux/rhel_6_selinux_sect-Security-Enhanced_Linux-Working_with_SELinux-SELinux_Contexts_Labeling_Files.html http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/rhel6/rhel_6_selinux/rhel_6_selinux_sect-Security-Enhanced_Linux-SELinux_Contexts_Labeling_Files-Persistent_Changes_semanage_fcontext.html Perhaps these website could help with the google-chrome SELinux issues. Comment 122 by Deleted [email protected], Mar 26 2012 Processing Hi All, I just downloaded chrome from the google site and it did not start on my redhat 6.2 machine. Bug reported and fixed by [email protected] Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8165010 commit 82a3e887544e4ad18d9a1df6ccee60cae67582d7 Author: [email protected] Date: Fri Dec 10 00:22:03 2010 +0000 Make the code more friendly to Clang and other modern How To Disable Selinux The DEPS rolls have been setup so that they don't pull in any other changes.

Comment 55 by [email protected], Sep 23 2011 Processing @scarybeasts: for stable I see this: # eu-findtextrel /opt/google/chrome/chrome |sort |uniq eu-findtextrel: no text relocations reported in '/opt/google/chrome/chrome' # rpm -qf /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome google-chrome-stable-14.0.835.186-101821.x86_64 how well this will work in this context has yet to be established) so I can use it for testing of sites while I do web development during my day job. Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. check over here This change alters the asm defines so that libvpx is free of text relocations on 32-bit Linux.

changed the selinux context back to chrome_sandbox_exec_t sudo restorecon -v /opt/google/chrome/chrome-sandbox 2. This change alters the asm defines so that libvpx is free of text relocations on 32-bit Linux. You signed in with another tab or window. That being said one way to fix this is to issue the SELinux chcon command: chcon -t usr_t /opt/google/chrome/chrome-sandbox However, the above technique is not persistent across an SELinux relabel or

You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. In fact the tons of relocations that are being complained about are being shoehorned into such a small range of _apparent_ problems because of the the small number of visible symbols Avraam Jack Dectis Comment 123 by [email protected], Mar 27 2012 Processing RHEL is not Fedora. Comment 15 by [email protected], Jun 30 2011 Processing Summary: Will not start on SELinux systems (was: NULL) Comment 16 by [email protected], Jun 30 2011 Processing We don't own the SELinux policy,

e.g. it's mentioend in the article as "PaX can _also_ randomize the return addresses of PIE programs with Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR)." [emphasis mine], shortly after all the initial discussion about Re: cannot restore segment prot after reloc: Permission denied 807603 Feb 12, 2008 4:51 PM (in response to 807603) I saw this error when compiling and running the jsvc daemon (used Picks up changes to make code PIC-clean on 32-bit Linux.

Otherwise I expect more and more people getting this update.