Home > Cannot Resolve > Cannot Resolve Some Domain Names

Cannot Resolve Some Domain Names

Contents

This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights. Browse other questions tagged domain-name-system bind dig or ask your own question. asked 6 years ago viewed 4349 times active 1 year ago Visit Chat Related 1Setting up a DNS name server for a mass virtual host with Bind90Registering a co.za using private SBS setup also confimed my internet Domain Name >>> for use with Exchange. his comment is here

There are no other DC's or servers of any kind on the >> internal network other than SBS2K3. Can you provide more info on this server? Clients are all >>>>>>> pointed to the internal DNS server only. If the nslookups work on all other servers using the DCs as DNS addresses which have been configured only with the Charter Forwarders, but doesn't work just on the eFilter server,

Dig No Servers Could Be Reached

com. 172800 IN NS l.gtld-servers.net. linux domain-name-system bind domain-name share|improve this question edited Jan 22 '15 at 17:40 HopelessN00b 44.6k1798168 asked Mar 31 '10 at 14:52 d-_-b 7762819 Stupid questions: Did you add the Should I share with them my testing results so maybe they can fix their servers? com. 172800 IN NS g.gtld-servers.net.

This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. I tried an e-mail to an AOL user >>> and still gets returned as unable to locate domain. The forwarders have been confirmed by my ISP to accept >>>>>>> recursive queries. Nslookup For some reason, I can't convince bind to talk to digbypine's name servers!

Needless to say this is >>>>>>> causing havoc with e-mail being returned as it cannot resolve. >>>>>>> There are some other domains but I have noticed aol.com more >>>>>>> often as dig mega.dude. +trace share|improve this answer edited Apr 1 '10 at 14:19 answered Apr 1 '10 at 5:11 James Sneeringer 5,2491223 Yup, I have that in /etc/resolv.conf I didn't Found nothing. https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/4523cdcd-5833-4312-966a-8cd400cc47f8/dns-not-resolving-some-addresses?forum=winserverNIS Thanks, Linn Hi Linn, It appears that you have five (5) Forwarders.

Port 53 TCP & UDP >>>>>>> on my SonicWALL is open to all incoming traffic. If you ping bbc.co.uk what output do you see? –Martin Smith Apr 16 '10 at 11:31 have you tried a different browser on the troubled computer? –quack quixote Apr Without actually seeing the nslookup >>>>>>> output is is hard to diagnose the problem. You are currently viewing LQ as a guest.

Bind Forwarders

Underbrace under nested square roots Typesetting text with math What are the applications of taking the output of an amp with a microphone? http://superuser.com/questions/131655/dns-cannot-resolve-a-web-site-address Here is my >>>>> nslookup output: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>============================================================================ >>>> ================= >>>>> >>>>> NSLOOKUP RESULT AGAINST ISP FORWARDER ADDRESS. >>>>> >>>>> Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790] >>>>> (C) Dig No Servers Could Be Reached matty, Jul 14, 2010 #4 falko Super Moderator ISPConfig Developer Can you post the bridgebase.com zone file? Server Can't Find Nxdomain However, thanks to all that helped sort out some other of my mistakes.

I've seen one or >>>>>>> two KB articles on this and they weren't helpful. this content Goodknecht [MVP], Nov 18, 2003 #4 DeathWarrant Guest On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:25:41 -0600, "Kevin D. Additionally if I set up the Fowarders >>>>>>>> given to me by my ISP then it will never resolve aol.com no >>>>>>>> matter if I flush the cache or not. What's the name of style where GM assumes idiotic behaviour unless stated otherwise? Bind9

Test 1: Deleted all but the two Charter DNS servers from DC1. What happens when you access the page (which error message)? –harrymc Apr 16 '10 at 11:52 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 5 down vote accepted questions = 1, answers = 0, authority records = 1, additional = 0 QUESTIONS: aol.com, type = A, class = IN AUTHORITY RECORDS: -> aol.com type = SOA, class = IN, weblink Query that converts timestamp to Date Does f:x mean the same thing as f(x)?

Why don't you try 4.2.2.2 as a forwarder to see if >>>> that clears this up? >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> Kevin D4 Dad Goodknecht Sr. [MVP] >>>> Here is my nslookup output: > > > > > ============================================================================ ================= > > NSLOOKUP RESULT AGAINST ISP FORWARDER ADDRESS. > > Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790] > (C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Compare them between your good and broken laptop.

Simple and Recursive DNS query test both >> PASS.

The latter is needed when the reply is too large (and comes back truncated), it will be re-requested via TCP, and so the request fails. I found an article that addressed it: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jonathan.deboynepollard/FGA/dns-edns0-and-firewalls.html I just applied the fixup protocol suggested under the service fix section, I up'd it to 1024 so now it reads: fixup protocol So I changed those too. com. 172800 IN NS c.gtld-servers.net.

However the second problem still stands even after the edit - you're giving it the very server name that it can't resolve! Friday, September 03, 2010 11:21 PM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote Hi Everyone, Sorry for not getting back to you all with the soluiton. About 6 WinXP clients and 8 Win2K >>>> clients. check over here share|improve this answer answered Sep 23 '11 at 13:42 Keith 3115 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote Hmm, what happens when you use nslookup to talk to their servers?

Test 2: Deleted all DNS Forwarders and entered 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 DNS servers as suggested by Ace. net. 172800 IN NS C.GTLD-SERVERS.net. Not the answer you're looking for? answer, want recursion, recursion avail.

Ran nslookup and set q=mx, typed yahoo.com and it resolved. Some possibilities could be firewalling, routing, & bogons. I >>>> tried a tracert again and still unable to resolve even though >>>> clearly the info is in the cache. Thanks in advance, Linn Tuesday, August 24, 2010 7:35 PM Reply | Quote Answers 0 Sign in to vote Hi Ace, Ok, now this is getting frustrating.

Just check that out. I have done rndc flush / rndc reload, I have reviewed each and every zone file on my system, looked for ANYTHING that could somehow explain this. Needless to say this is >>>>> causing havoc with e-mail being returned as it cannot resolve. >>>>> There are some other domains but I have noticed aol.com more >>>>> often as However, if I use my laptop through my company network, I can load the page bbc.co.uk normally.

To explain, DNS queries go over UDP first. When I: dig mega.dude I get no answer section. How to decline a postdoc interview if there is some possible future collaboration? The problem was with the EDNS0 setup, I needed to increase the DNS maximum-length setting.